![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
For those wishing to study up on the details of Mar-a-Lago in advance of next week, here are a few links to important source documents. The first is the 11th Circuit’s decision from last December, which provides a good summary of the history of the matter. media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/f
Thread
The second link is to the foia documents produced by NARA so far:
The third link is to the docket of the Mar-a-Lago search warrant case.
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="300" height="300"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Fifth link: The unsealed indictment.
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="271" height="350"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Sixth link: The Judge Jackson decision in the Clinton audiotapes foia case, which people keep mentioning. (Note: It doesn’t bind other courts as precedent, and is a bit different than some people have explained it). casetext.com/case/judicial-
Seventh link. Actually just images. The Grand Jury subpoena and the certification filed in response.
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="645"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="547" height="680"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Eighth link: Jack Smith appointment order. justice.gov/opa/press-rele
Tenth link: A few images with potentially significant dates of events in the June 2022 timeline, that are not necessarily referenced in the indictment.
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="599" height="680"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="634" height="872"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="750" height="202"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)